The Influence of Digital Platform Use on Digital Language Politeness among Students of Bina Dharma Junior High School

Authors

  • Ines Nur Irawan Digital Business Study Program, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta Author
  • Mila Karina Digital Business Study Program, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta Author
  • Fitri Nurbaiti Digital Business Study Program, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Jakarta Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70904/

Keywords:

Digital Platforms, Digital Language Politeness, Digital Literacy

Abstract

The rapid integration of digital platforms in education has transformed students’ communication patterns, particularly in digital language interactions. This transformation has raised new challenges related to digital language politeness among junior high school students. This study aimed to examine the effect of digital platform utilization on the digital language politeness of students at SMP Bina Dharma. The study employed a quantitative approach with a correlational research design. The sample consisted of 64 students of SMP Bina Dharma who were selected as research respondents. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire measuring digital platform utilization as the independent variable (X), which included intensity of use, types of platforms, and purposes of use, and digital language politeness as the dependent variable (Y), which covered word choice, communication style, and digital interaction ethics. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS), supported by descriptive statistical analysis and validity and reliability testing. The results indicated that digital platform utilization had a positive and statistically significant effect on students’ digital language politeness, with a path coefficient of 0.97, a t-statistic value greater than 1.96, and a p-value less than 0.05. The coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.95, indicating that digital platform utilization explained 95% of the variance in students’ digital language politeness, while the remaining variance was influenced by other factors outside the model. The research instruments were proven to be valid and reliable, with Cronbach’s Alpha and Composite Reliability values exceeding 0.80. Therefore, this study successfully demonstrated that appropriate and responsible utilization of digital platforms significantly contributed to the improvement of digital language politeness among students at SMP Bina Dharma. The findings provided practical implications for schools in developing ethical digital literacy policies.

References

Ansoriyah, S., & Irawan, I. N. (2023). Development of Network-Based Popular Writing Teaching Materials. Proceedings of the Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_31

Ansoriyah, A., Rahayu, F., & Nurdin, H. (2023). Nilai-nilai etika komunikasi digital remaja di era media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Digital, 8(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.36722/jkomdig.v8i1.254

Ansoriyah, S., Utami, S. R., Rahayu, P., & Irawan, I. N. (2024). Evaluate Android-based Digital Translation Development Needs for Applied Linguistics. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 100-116–100–116. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i9.15662

Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2020). Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 1–7.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Cintia, H., Radita, A., Muttaqqin, M. A., & Irawan, I. N. (2024). The Essential Analysis of Fundamental Subjects of Bahasa Indonesia and English in the University’s Departments. Sabda: Jurnal Sastra Dan Bahasa, 3(1), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.572349/SABDA.V3I1.1707

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darics, E., & Koller, V. (2019). Politeness in digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 28, 1–10.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Ernst & Young. (2021). Reimagining the workplace: Financial services and the digital future. EY Global.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Herring, S. C., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2019). Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 127–151). Wiley-Blackwell.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.

Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2015). Managing BYOD: How do organizations incorporate employee-driven innovation? Information Technology & People, 28(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2014-0082

Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Kelly, A. (2021). The benefits and risks of children’s digital participation. London School of Economics and Political Science.

Mas'udah, S., Fauziyah, D., & Ramadhan, Y. (2021). Etika berbahasa digital siswa dalam konteks komunikasi pendidikan. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.24815/jbsi.v10i1.20334

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miller, K. W., Voas, J., & Hurlburt, G. F. (2012). BYOD: Security and privacy considerations. IT Professional, 14(5), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2012.71

Nasrullah, R. (2020). Media sosial: Perspektif komunikasi, budaya, dan sosioteknologi (ed. revisi). Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Ng, W. (2019). New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators. Springer

Petter, S., DeLone, W., & McLean, E. R. (2008). Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 236–263. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15

Pradipta, P. (2022). Kewirausahaan digital dan perilaku komunikasi siswa di platform daring. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 6(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpek.v6i2.445

Zidansyah, A., Marcelida, A., Lativa, N., Ramadhan, R. K., & Irawan, I. N. (2024). Digital Literacy in Developing Public Understanding of Advertisements on the Shopee Platform. Intellectual Article Studies of Social, Language, and Art, 1(1), 28–33. https://pub.ruangrosadi.com/jurnal-ilmiah/index.php/interstellar/article/view/28

Downloads

Published

2026-01-23

How to Cite

The Influence of Digital Platform Use on Digital Language Politeness among Students of Bina Dharma Junior High School. (2026). Intellectual Article Studies of Social, Language, and Art, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.70904/